Posts Tagged Lost
Tuesday Night Recaps: What Kate Does on “Lost”
Posted by Melanie McFarland in Commentary, Episode Recaps on February 10th, 2010
(If you haven’t seen last night’s “Lost” episode, please stop reading now. Really. We mean it.)
Confession time: I am not one of those people who scours each “Lost” episode for hidden meanings, Easter eggs and the rest of that frimfram sauce. I would rather munch on cookies and watch it in peace, then read all the various comb-throughs of said episode the next morning.
Lots of people have been thinking deep thoughts about this show for several seasons now and frankly, they’re much better at spotting the hidden meanings and symbolism and frimfram sauce ingredients than I am. So if that’s the kind of “Lost” post you’re looking for, I recommend reading this column, or this blog post, or this one. Or read this one for the entertainment value.
I will say this, however: “What Kate Does” was an interesting episode not because of the action between Kate and Claire in the parallel universe, or the idea that Claire has assumed Rousseau’s role on the island.
(Keep reading, or scroll to the bottom to go straight to our recaps.)
Don’t Tell TV to Get Lost, Matthew Fox
Posted by Melanie McFarland in Commentary, TV News on February 3rd, 2010
Dear Mr. Fox: First off, congratulations to you and the rest of the “Lost” cast and crew for making six seasons of a drama that will leave the TV landscape noticeably poorer when it ends. Not every actor can say he was part of such a revolutionary experience.
Now that we’ve gotten that out of the way, can we talk about this “I’m done with TV” business?
Granted, any person can understand your desire to take a break from the TV industry. The production schedule is grueling. The publicity merry-go-round, probably quite draining. We know you appreciate your fans, but you seem like a guy who dreams of the day he can peacefully enjoy a meal at a diner somewhere in Oregon. We’d want to pull out of the Hollywood scene too if we were as famous as you are.
But publicly declaring that you’re done with TV and ready to try films? Please. One would think you would have learned from the walking lesson in hubris that is David Caruso.
Here’s the thing, Matt: We get the sense that the movie cameras won’t appreciate you in the same loving way that the small screen does. Your career was born on TV and, provided you want to stay in the entertainment industry after this, you will likely hear the boob tube jungle calling to you once more someday. When that happens you should turn to your loved ones, tears in your red-rimmed eyes and yell, “I gotta go baaaack!”
Of course, this all depends on what you mean by trying films.
Are you hoping to become the next George Clooney or Bruce Willis? Nope. Not going to happen overnight. Might not ever happen. Keep reading for a few reasons why:



Goodbye, Mr. Carmichael: “Chuck” Airs Its Finale
Posted by Melanie McFarland in Cancellations, Commentary, Nostalgia, Review, TV News on January 27th, 2012
Even the most beloved TV series must come to an end. But it’s nearly impossible for a series to end in a way that is universally satisfying. In fact, a number of shows widely considered to be among the best the medium had to offer ended quite badly.
Not “Chuck.”
So what if, quality-wise, “Chuck” isn’t in the same league as the “Losts” and “The Sopranos” of the world? It’s a show about a nerd who gets superpowers overnight, courtesy of a software program known as the Intersect. Only the silly would expect much in the way of profundity here.
But even when “Chuck” wasn’t great, it was usually a good time. By the end of its final two episodes, “Chuck Versus Sarah” and “Chuck Versus the Goodbye,” fans are just as likely to be smiling as crying – or smiling while they cry. It might not please everybody — nothing in life does — but it should come close.
As series creators and executive producers Chris Fedak and Josh Schwartz reminded TV writers in a farewell letter, this is actually the fourth series finale that was written for “Chuck.” With that kind of practice, they had no excuse to do anything but end it well.
The sendoff for Chuck Bartowski (Zachary Levi), his beloved wife Sarah Walker (Yvonne Strahovski), best friend Morgan Grimes (Joshua Gomez), and fellow agent John Casey (Adam Baldwin), ends their story with precisely the right balance of bittersweetness, heartbreak, giggles and optimism. And yes, there’s a lot jammed into that last episode. It’s essentially the show’s greatest hits parade, delivering a goodbye kiss (with a lot of tongue-in-cheek humor) to all of the elements that made “Chuck” perennially charming.
In the end, the beating heart of the show is still the love story between a beauty and a geek. “Chuck” was far from a perfect show, but Chuck and Sarah’s romance was never one of its questionable qualities. We rooted for Chuck to get the girl as much as we cheered him on when he got his fighting upgrades.
At the start of that penultimate episode, however, it’s no longer clear that he has either of these things. To say any more than that would ruin the experience of watching the finale, which airs across two back-to-back episodes tonight, starting at 8pm ET/PT on NBC.
Except for this — don’t be surprised if you are seized by the urge to review the series from the beginning as the final credits roll. The Intersect doesn’t actually exist, but this show’s uncanny ability to flip your nostalgia switch to the “on” position is very real.
Adam Baldwin, Chuck, Joshua Gomez, Lost, The Sopranos, Yvonne Strahovski, Zachary Levi
1 Comment